Arc Graphics 140V vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc Graphics 140V

15

5,168

0.0%

Iris Plus Graphics 655

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

5,353

+3.6%

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

Titan X Pascal

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank 308 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q is on rank 16, so the Quadro P2000 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

95%

#298

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

735%

#300

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

666%

#301

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

665%

#305

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

604%

#306

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

600%

#308

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

100%

#309

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

99%

#312

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

96%

#314

GeForce GT 720A

MSRP: $40|Avg: $40

96%

#315

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

96%

#320

GeForce 940A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

94%

#323

Radeon RX 640

MSRP: $159|Avg: $55

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 Max-Q

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

221%

#16

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

66%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

59%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2017). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.

Insight	Arc Graphics 140V	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%)
Longevity	Xe² (2024) (3nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P2000 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc Graphics 140V Benchmark Check

Quadro P2000 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 3 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	5,168	5,353+4%
Architecture	Xe²	Pascal
Process Node	3 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	8	768+9500%
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+40%	1468 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	Shared	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 136.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.