Arc Graphics 140V
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Arc Graphics 140V vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 140V vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc Graphics 140V vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 140V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Quadro P2000 Max-Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140V vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 3 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 5,353+4% |
| Architecture | Xe² | Pascal |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 768+9500% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+40% | 1468 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q carries 4 GB. Quadro P2000 Max-Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 Max-Q.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 136.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-81% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+415% | 66.9 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | — |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | GP107GL |
| Release | September 24 2024 | July 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #434 | #426 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and Quadro P2000 Max-Q
