Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon R9 M395X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon R9 M395X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 140V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon R9 M395X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon R9 M395X
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌71.4% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 5,120 |
| Architecture | Xe² | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2048+25500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M395X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+404% | 68.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 140V came in at $350, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 140V was 41.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Arc Graphics 140V offers 74.1% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-42% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8+74% | 8.5 |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Amethyst |
| Release | September 24 2024 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #434 | #438 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















