Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon R9 M395X

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M395X

2015Core: 723 MHz

Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon R9 M395X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140V

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $250 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • Delivers 73% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • Radeon R9 M395X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R9 M395X

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 71.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $600 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc Graphics 140V is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (5,168 vs 5,120), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 140V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140V makes the most sense to buy today. It is $250 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 73% (14.8 vs 8.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon R9 M395X
G3D Mark Score
5,168
5,120
Architecture
Xe²
GCN 3.0
Process Node
3 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
8
2048+25500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon R9 M395X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M395X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon R9 M395X
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
160 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon R9 M395X
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
344.5+404%
68.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140V came in at $350, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 140V was 41.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Arc Graphics 140V offers 74.1% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon R9 M395X
MSRP
$350-42%
$600
Performance per Dollar
14.8+74%
8.5
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
Amethyst
Release
September 24 2024
May 5 2015
Ranking
#434
#438

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.