Arc Graphics 140V
VS
GRID P4-8Q

Arc Graphics 140V vs GRID P4-8Q

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz
VS

GRID P4-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank 308 and the GRID P4-8Q is on rank 261, so the GRID P4-8Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V

#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
95%
#298
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
735%
#300
666%
#301
665%
#305
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
604%
#306
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
600%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
100%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
99%
#312
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
96%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
96%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
96%
#320
GeForce 940A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
94%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-8Q

#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
98%
#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
89%
#246
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5596%
#261
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
100%
#262
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
100%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
97%
#265
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
95%
#266
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
95%
#267
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
95%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
94%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
94%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
93%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
93%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
91%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
90%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P4-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID P4-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.

InsightArc Graphics 140VGRID P4-8Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity
Xe² (2024) (3nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID P4-8Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 53.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightArc Graphics 140VGRID P4-8Q
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+53.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and GRID P4-8Q

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

NVIDIA

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the GRID P4-8Q reaches 5,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GRID P4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGRID P4-8Q
G3D Mark Score
5,168
5,283+2%
Architecture
Xe²
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
3 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
8
1536+19100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGRID P4-8Q
Upscaling Tech
XeSS
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID P4-8Q has 4 GB. The GRID P4-8Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGRID P4-8Q
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GRID P4-8Q's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (GRID P4-8Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGRID P4-8Q
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
344.5+552%
52.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000 and now averages $200. The GRID P4-8Q costs 33.3% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 26.4 (GRID P4-8Q) — the GRID P4-8Q offers 53.5% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGRID P4-8Q
MSRP
$350-83%
$2000
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$200-33%
Performance per Dollar
17.2
26.4+53%
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
GM204
Release
September 24 2024
August 30 2015
Ranking
#434
#535