
Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon HD 8990

Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8990
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank #308 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2013). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8990 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8990 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (3 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc Graphics 140V offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $999 for the Radeon HD 8990, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 230.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+230.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon HD 8990

Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

Radeon HD 8990
The Radeon HD 8990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,214 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Radeon HD 8990 reaches 5,214 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Radeon HD 8990 uses GCN 1.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 8990). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 5,214 |
| Architecture | Xe² | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2048 ×2+25500% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+105% | 1000 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8990 has 3 GB. The Radeon HD 8990 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 384-bit x2.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 288 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | System | 384-bit x2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 8990's 375W — a 184.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 750W (Radeon HD 8990). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 8-pin.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-96% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+2378% | 13.9 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon HD 8990 launched at $999 and now averages $999. The Arc Graphics 140V costs 70% less ($699 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 5.2 (Radeon HD 8990) — the Arc Graphics 140V offers 230.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2013).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-65% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-70% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2+231% | 5.2 |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Malta |
| Release | September 24 2024 | April 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #434 | #412 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















