Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Performance Spectrum

Arc Graphics 140V
Shared 15
5,168
0.0%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc Graphics 130V
brand logoArc 7-Cores iGPU
brand logoArc B570
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
4 GB 210
5,200
+0.6%
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 660
brand logoGeForce MX550
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140V

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 210W, a 195W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    21.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $350 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 21.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌1300% higher power demand at 210W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (5,200 vs 5,168), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 140V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $61 cheaper on MSRP at $289 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 21.9% (18.0 vs 14.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Arc Graphics 140V has the stronger long-term case.

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 reaches 5,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 3 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
G3D Mark Score
5,168
5,200
Architecture
Xe²
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
3 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
8
448+5500%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc Graphics 140V leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
156 GB/s
Bus Width
System
320-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL
4.6+10%
4.2
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
UVD 4.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
PureVideo VP4
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448's 210W — a 173.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 76°C.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
TDP
15W-93%
210W
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
Integrated
2x 6-pin
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
76°C-11%
Perf/Watt
344.5+1289%
24.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140V came in at $350, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 was 17.4% cheaper ($61 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 21.6% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2011).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
MSRP
$350
$289-17%
Performance per Dollar
14.8
18.0+22%
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
GF110
Release
September 24 2024
November 29 2011
Ranking
#434
#571
Search Arc Graphics 140V on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.