Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

2018Core: 1392 MHzBoost: 1518 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Performance Spectrum

Arc Graphics 140V
Shared 15
5,168
+1.0%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc Graphics 130V
brand logoArc 7-Cores iGPU
brand logoArc B570
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
3 GB 75
5,116
0.0%
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
brand logoGeForce GTX 570
brand logoGeForce MX550
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140V

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    171.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $350 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $221 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 168.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc Graphics 140V is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (5,168 vs 5,116), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 140V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $221 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 168.6% (39.7 vs 14.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Arc Graphics 140V has the stronger long-term case.

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB reaches 5,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB uses Pascal, both on 3 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1518 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
G3D Mark Score
5,168+1%
5,116
Architecture
Xe²
Pascal
Process Node
3 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
8
768+9500%
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+35%
1518 MHz
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc Graphics 140V leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
VRAM Capacity
Shared
3 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
84 GB/s
Bus Width
System
96-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC 6.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
0mm
145mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
65-24%
Perf/Watt
344.5+405%
68.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140V came in at $350, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB was 63.1% cheaper ($221 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 168.2% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2018).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
MSRP
$350
$129-63%
Performance per Dollar
14.8
39.7+168%
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
GP107
Release
September 24 2024
May 21 2018
Ranking
#434
#440
Search Arc Graphics 140V on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1050 3GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.