Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X Performance Spectrum

Arc Graphics 140V
Shared 15
5,168
0.0%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc Graphics 130V
brand logoArc 7-Cores iGPU
brand logoArc B570
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
3 GB 200
5,248
+1.5%
brand logoRadeon R7 260
brand logoRadeon RX 550 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon HD 7800-serie
brand logoRadeon R9 Nano
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 6600 LE
brand logoRadeon 8060S
brand logoRadeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140V

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    17.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $350 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 18.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (5,248 vs 5,168), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 140V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 18.9% (17.6 vs 14.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Arc Graphics 140V has the stronger long-term case.

Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X reaches 5,248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
G3D Mark Score
5,168
5,248+2%
Architecture
Xe²
GCN 1.0
Process Node
3 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
8
2048+25500%
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+105%
1000 MHz
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X carries 3 GB. Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 384-bit on the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
VRAM Capacity
Shared
3 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
264 GB/s
Bus Width
System
384-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCE 1.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X's 200W — a 172.1% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 275mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80 C.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
TDP
15W-93%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
Integrated
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
0mm
275mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
80 C-6%
Perf/Watt
344.5+1215%
26.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140V came in at $350, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X launched at $299. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X was 14.6% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 17.6 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 18.9% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2013).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
MSRP
$350
$299-15%
Performance per Dollar
14.8
17.6+19%
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
Tahiti
Release
September 24 2024
October 8 2013
Ranking
#434
#404
Search Arc Graphics 140V on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.