Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank #308 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2013). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (3 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (275mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 661.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+661.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X reaches 5,248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 5,248+2% |
| Architecture | Xe² | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2048+25500% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+105% | 1000 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X has 3 GB. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 264 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 384-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X's 200W — a 172.1% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 275mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80 C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 275mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80 C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+1215% | 26.2 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X launched at $299 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X costs 86.7% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 131.2 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 662.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2013).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $299-15% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $40-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 131.2+663% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Tahiti |
| Release | September 24 2024 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #434 | #404 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
