Arc A370M vs Arc Graphics 140V

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc A370M is positioned at rank 211 and the Arc Graphics 140V is on rank 308, so the Arc A370M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

88%

#201

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

422%

#203

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

383%

#204

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

382%

#208

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

347%

#209

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

345%

#211

Arc A370M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

100%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

95%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

92%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

91%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

95%

#298

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

735%

#300

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

666%

#301

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

665%

#305

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

604%

#306

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

600%

#308

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

100%

#309

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

99%

#312

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

96%

#314

GeForce GT 720A

MSRP: $40|Avg: $40

96%

#315

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

96%

#320

GeForce 940A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

94%

#323

Radeon RX 640

MSRP: $159|Avg: $55

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc Graphics 140V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A370M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Arc A370M	Arc Graphics 140V
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)	Xe² (2024) (3nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc Graphics 140V remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A370M Benchmark Check

Arc Graphics 140V Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A370M and Arc Graphics 140V

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the Arc Graphics 140V reaches 5,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Arc Graphics 140V uses Xe², both on 6 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140V). Boost clocks: 1550 MHz vs 2050 MHz.

Feature	Arc A370M	Arc Graphics 140V
G3D Mark Score	5,115	5,168+1%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Xe²
Process Node	6 nm	3 nm
Shading Units	1024+12700%	8
Boost Clock	1550 MHz	2050 MHz+32%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A370M	Arc Graphics 140V
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	XeSS
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A370M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB. The Arc A370M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	Arc A370M	Arc Graphics 140V
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Arc A370M	Arc Graphics 140V
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V).

Feature	Arc A370M	Arc Graphics 140V
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the Arc Graphics 140V's 15W — a 80% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140V). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 85°C.