Arc A370M vs FirePro W7100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A370M vs FirePro W7100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A370M vs FirePro W7100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

FirePro W7100

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A370M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (5,115 vs 5,065), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro W7100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W7100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A370M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A370M vs FirePro W7100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

FirePro W7100

The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the FirePro W7100 reaches 5,065 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the FirePro W7100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 1,792 (FirePro W7100). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100).

Feature	Arc A370M	FirePro W7100
G3D Mark Score	5,115	5,065
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	1792+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.174 TFLOPS	3.297 TFLOPS+4%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	112+75%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+241%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A370M	FirePro W7100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A370M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W7100 carries 8 GB. FirePro W7100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 128-bit on the FirePro W7100. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W7100) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A370M	FirePro W7100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A370M	FirePro W7100
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100).

Feature	Arc A370M	FirePro W7100
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCE 3.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 5.0
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the FirePro W7100's 150W — a 124.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (FirePro W7100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 95.

Feature	Arc A370M	FirePro W7100
TDP	35W-77%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	241mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	90-5%	95
Perf/Watt	146.1+332%	33.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A370M (2022 vs 2014).

Feature	Arc A370M	FirePro W7100
MSRP	—	$799
Codename	DG2-128	Tonga
Release	March 30 2022	August 12 2014
Ranking	#439	#406

Search Arc A370M on Amazon

Search FirePro W7100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.