Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

CPU

GPU

Arc A370M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1550 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Performance Spectrum

Arc A370M

4 GB 35

5,115

0.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

4 GB 210

5,200

+1.7%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

✅18.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 210W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A370M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌500% higher power demand at 210W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A370M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 instead at 5,200 vs 5,115, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 40nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A370M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 reaches 5,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
G3D Mark Score	5,115	5,200+2%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1024+129%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.174 TFLOPS+142%	1.312 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	64+14%	56
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+70%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+535%	0.63 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A370M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — a 39.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	156 GB/s+39%
Bus Width	64-bit	320-bit+400%
L2 Cache	4 MB+535%	0.63 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo VP4
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448's 210W — a 142.9% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 76°C.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
TDP	35W-83%	210W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	90	76°C-16%
Perf/Watt	146.1+489%	24.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A370M (2022 vs 2011).

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
MSRP	—	$289
Codename	DG2-128	GF110
Release	March 30 2022	November 29 2011
Ranking	#439	#571

Search Arc A370M on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.