Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Arc A370M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1550 MHz

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A370M

5,115

0.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

210

5,200

+1.7%

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc A370M is positioned at rank #211 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

88%

#201

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

422%

#203

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

383%

#204

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

382%

#208

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

347%

#209

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

345%

#211

Arc A370M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

100%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

95%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

92%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

91%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc A370M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2011). The Arc A370M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A370M.

Insight	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A370M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A370M and GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 reaches 5,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
G3D Mark Score	5,115	5,200+2%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1024+129%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.174 TFLOPS+142%	1.312 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	64+14%	56
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+70%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+535%	0.63 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — a 39.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. Bus width: 64-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	156 GB/s+39%
Bus Width	64-bit	320-bit+400%
L2 Cache	4 MB+535%	0.63 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo VP4
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448's 210W — a 142.9% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 76°C.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
TDP	35W-83%	210W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	90	76°C-16%
Perf/Watt	146.1+489%	24.8