Arc A370M vs Radeon Pro Vega 20

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc A370M is positioned at rank #211 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

88%

#201

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

422%

#203

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

383%

#204

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

382%

#208

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

347%

#209

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

345%

#211

Arc A370M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

100%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

95%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

92%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

91%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A370M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Arc A370M	Radeon Pro Vega 20
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 20 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A370M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega 20 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A370M and Radeon Pro Vega 20

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 20

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 reaches 5,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Boost clocks: 1550 MHz vs 1283 MHz.

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon Pro Vega 20
G3D Mark Score	5,115	5,169+1%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 5.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024	1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.174 TFLOPS	3.284 TFLOPS+3%
Boost Clock	1550 MHz+21%	1283 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+384%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon Pro Vega 20
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A370M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 0 MB. The Arc A370M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon Pro Vega 20
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon Pro Vega 20
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20).

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon Pro Vega 20
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCE 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 7.0
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 96.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 80.

Feature	Arc A370M	Radeon Pro Vega 20
TDP	35W-65%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	90	80-11%
Perf/Watt	146.1+183%	51.7