Arc A370M vs Radeon Pro Vega 20

Intel

Arc A370M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1550 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 20

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1283 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc A370M vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A370M vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A370M vs Radeon Pro Vega 20: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

  • 12.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro Vega 20

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc A370M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A370M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro Vega 20 instead at 5,169 vs 5,115, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A370M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc A370M vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 20

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 reaches 5,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Boost clocks: 1550 MHz vs 1283 MHz.

FeatureArc A370MRadeon Pro Vega 20
G3D Mark Score
5,115
5,169+1%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GCN 5.0
Process Node
6 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1024
1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.174 TFLOPS
3.284 TFLOPS+3%
Boost Clock
1550 MHz+21%
1283 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
80+25%
L1 Cache
1.5 MB+384%
0.31 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A370MRadeon Pro Vega 20
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A370M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 carries 0 MB. Arc A370M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 20. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A370MRadeon Pro Vega 20
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A370MRadeon Pro Vega 20
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20).

FeatureArc A370MRadeon Pro Vega 20
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCE 4.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
UVD 7.0
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 96.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 80.

FeatureArc A370MRadeon Pro Vega 20
TDP
35W-65%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90
80-11%
Perf/Watt
146.1+183%
51.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A370M (2022 vs 2018).

FeatureArc A370MRadeon Pro Vega 20
MSRP
$0
Codename
DG2-128
Vega 12
Release
March 30 2022
November 14 2018
Ranking
#439
#435

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.