Arc A370M vs Tesla K8

Intel

Arc A370M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1550 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K8

2014Core: 693 MHzBoost: 811 MHz

Arc A370M vs Tesla K8 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A370M vs Tesla K8: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Tesla K8

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A370M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (5,115 vs 5,111), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla K8 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla K8 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A370M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A370M vs Tesla K8 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla K8

The Tesla K8 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 16 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 693 MHz to 811 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,111 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the Tesla K8 reaches 5,111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Tesla K8 uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 1,536 (Tesla K8). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 2.491 TFLOPS (Tesla K8). Boost clocks: 1550 MHz vs 811 MHz.

FeatureArc A370MTesla K8
G3D Mark Score
5,115
5,111
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Kepler
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
1536+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.174 TFLOPS+27%
2.491 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1550 MHz+91%
811 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
1.5 MB+1054%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A370MTesla K8
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 128-bit on the Tesla K8. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 0.5 MB (Tesla K8) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A370MTesla K8
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the Tesla K8's 100W — a 96.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (Tesla K8). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureArc A370MTesla K8
TDP
35W-65%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90
Perf/Watt
146.1+186%
51.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A370M (2022 vs 2014).

FeatureArc A370MTesla K8
MSRP
$1000
Codename
DG2-128
GK104
Release
March 30 2022
September 16 2014
Ranking
#439
#515

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.