Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

CPU

GPU

Arc A370M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1550 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

2018Core: 1392 MHzBoost: 1518 MHz

GTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Performance Spectrum

Arc A370M

4 GB 35

5,115

0.0%

5,116

0.0%

GeForce MX350

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

GeForce GTX 570

GeForce MX550

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A370M

2022

Why buy it

✅52.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A370M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A370M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 52.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 3GB instead at 5,116 vs 5,115, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A370M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A370M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB reaches 5,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Boost clocks: 1550 MHz vs 1518 MHz.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
G3D Mark Score	5,115	5,116
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Pascal
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.174 TFLOPS+36%	2.332 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1550 MHz+2%	1518 MHz
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+436%	0.28 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+433%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A370M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A370M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB carries 3 GB. Arc A370M gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — a 33.3% advantage for the Arc A370M. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+33%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s+33%	84 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	96-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB+433%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB).

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC 3.0
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 65.

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
TDP	35W-53%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	145mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	90	65-28%
Perf/Watt	146.1+114%	68.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A370M (2022 vs 2018).

Feature	Arc A370M	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
MSRP	—	$129
Codename	DG2-128	GP107
Release	March 30 2022	May 21 2018
Ranking	#439	#440

Search Arc A370M on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1050 3GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.