Arc A370M vs GRID P4-8Q
Arc A370M
Popular choices:
GRID P4-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc A370M is positioned at rank 211 and the GRID P4-8Q is on rank 261, so the Arc A370M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A370M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Arc A370M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P4-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A370M.
| Insight | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID P4-8Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A370M and GRID P4-8Q
Arc A370M
The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.
GRID P4-8Q
The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the GRID P4-8Q reaches 5,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GRID P4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q).
| Feature | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,115 | 5,283+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.174 TFLOPS+43% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 96+50% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+168% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the GRID P4-8Q's 100W — a 96.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (GRID P4-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-65% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 146.1+177% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A370M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $200 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GM204 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #439 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A370M and GRID P4-8Q
