Arc A370M vs GRID P4-8Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A370M vs GRID P4-8Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc A370M vs GRID P4-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A370M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
GRID P4-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A370M vs GRID P4-8Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A370M
The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.
GRID P4-8Q
The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the GRID P4-8Q reaches 5,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GRID P4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q).
| Feature | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,115 | 5,283+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.174 TFLOPS+43% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 96+50% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+168% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A370M and 128-bit on the GRID P4-8Q. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the GRID P4-8Q's 100W — a 96.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (GRID P4-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-65% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 146.1+177% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc A370M (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc A370M | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GM204 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #439 | #535 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A370M and GRID P4-8Q
