Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon Pro Vega 20
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank #308 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 20 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon Pro Vega 20
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
Radeon Pro Vega 20
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 reaches 5,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on 3 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1283 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 5,169 |
| Architecture | Xe² | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1280+15900% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+60% | 1283 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+566% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 costs 100+% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 offers Infinity% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Vega 12 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #434 | #435 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon Pro Vega 20
