Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018Core: 1152 MHzBoost: 1417 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum

Arc Graphics 140V
Shared 15
5,168
0.0%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc Graphics 130V
brand logoArc 7-Cores iGPU
brand logoArc B570
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
4 GB 75
5,310
+2.7%
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 870M
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 580
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoTitan X Pascal
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140V

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (5,310 vs 5,168), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 140V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140V makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 5,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 3 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1417 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
5,168
5,310+3%
Architecture
Xe²
Pascal
Process Node
3 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
8
768+9500%
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+45%
1417 MHz
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc Graphics 140V leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
112 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
—
Height
0mm
—
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
344.5+387%
70.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2018).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
MSRP
$350
—
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
GP107
Release
September 24 2024
January 3 2018
Ranking
#434
#429
Search Arc Graphics 140V on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.