Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank 308 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is on rank 15, so the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 5,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 3 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1417 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 5,310+3% |
| Architecture | Xe² | Pascal |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 768+9500% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+45% | 1417 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+387% | 70.8 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | — |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | GP107 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | January 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #434 | #429 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
