Arc Graphics 140V vs Arc A370M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank 308 and the Arc A370M is on rank 211, so the Arc A370M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

95%

#298

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

735%

#300

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

666%

#301

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

665%

#305

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

604%

#306

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

600%

#308

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

100%

#309

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

99%

#312

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

96%

#314

GeForce GT 720A

MSRP: $40|Avg: $40

96%

#315

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

96%

#320

GeForce 940A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

94%

#323

Radeon RX 640

MSRP: $159|Avg: $55

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

88%

#201

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

422%

#203

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

383%

#204

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

382%

#208

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

347%

#209

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

345%

#211

Arc A370M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

100%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

95%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

92%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

91%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc Graphics 140V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A370M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Arc Graphics 140V	Arc A370M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity	Xe² (2024) (3nm)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc Graphics 140V remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc Graphics 140V Benchmark Check

Arc A370M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and Arc A370M

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Arc A370M reaches 5,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Arc A370M uses Generation 12.7, both on 3 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 1,024 (Arc A370M). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1550 MHz.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	Arc A370M
G3D Mark Score	5,168+1%	5,115
Architecture	Xe²	Generation 12.7
Process Node	3 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	8	1024+12700%
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+32%	1550 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	Arc A370M
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	XeSS
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Arc A370M has 4 GB. The Arc A370M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	Arc A370M
VRAM Capacity	Shared	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	System	112 GB/s
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	Arc A370M
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M).

Feature	Arc Graphics 140V	Arc A370M
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Arc A370M's 35W — a 80% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (Arc A370M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90.