Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon RX 6300
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank 308 and the Radeon RX 6300 is on rank 14, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 671.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+671.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon RX 6300
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 3 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 5,319+3% |
| Architecture | Xe² | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 768+9500% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 2400 MHz+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc Graphics 140V lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 6300 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 32-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 32-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 80% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-57% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 160mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+127% | 152.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 6300 costs 86.7% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 133.0 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 673.3% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $60-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $40-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 133.0+673% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Navi 24 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #434 | #379 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon RX 6300
