Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon RX 6300

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140V

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
  • More future proof: Xe² (2024) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 483.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $350 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $290 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • Delivers 500.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 6300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (5,319 vs 5,168), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Arc Graphics 140V is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, and 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $290 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 500.4% (88.7 vs 14.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 3 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score
5,168
5,319+3%
Architecture
Xe²
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
3 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
8
768+9500%
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
2400 MHz+17%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc Graphics 140V does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 6300 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
64 GB/s
Bus Width
System
32-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon RX 6300
DirectX
12.2+2%
12_2
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon RX 6300
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCN 3.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 80% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon RX 6300
TDP
15W-57%
35W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
160mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
344.5+127%
152.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140V came in at $350, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 82.9% cheaper ($290 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 499.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2022).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VRadeon RX 6300
MSRP
$350
$60-83%
Performance per Dollar
14.8
88.7+499%
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
Navi 24
Release
September 24 2024
January 4 2022
Ranking
#434
#379

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.