Arc Graphics 140V vs GRID M60-2Q
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
GRID M60-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank 308 and the GRID M60-2Q is on rank 305, so the GRID M60-2Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M60-2Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M60-2Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 101.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+101.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and GRID M60-2Q
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
GRID M60-2Q
The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 5,203 |
| Architecture | Xe² | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2048+25500% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+74% | 1178 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-2Q has 4 GB. The GRID M60-2Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W — a 175% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+1391% | 23.1 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The GRID M60-2Q costs 50% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 34.7 (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q offers 101.7% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-88% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $150-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 34.7+102% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | GM204 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #434 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and GRID M60-2Q
