Arc Graphics 140V
GRID M60-2Q
Arc Graphics 140V vs GRID M60-2Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 140V vs GRID M60-2Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc Graphics 140V vs GRID M60-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 140V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,650 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 751.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅GRID M60-2Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GRID M60-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌757.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140V vs GRID M60-2Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
GRID M60-2Q
The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 5,203 |
| Architecture | Xe² | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2048+25500% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+74% | 1178 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-2Q carries 4 GB. GRID M60-2Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 128-bit on the GRID M60-2Q.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W — a 175% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+1391% | 23.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 140V came in at $350, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 140V was 88.3% cheaper ($2650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) — the Arc Graphics 140V offers 770.6% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-88% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8+771% | 1.7 |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | GM204 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #434 | #433 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and GRID M60-2Q
