Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank #308 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 142.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-142.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+142.6%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 30% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 248.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+248.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 142.6%. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 3 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168 | 12,535+143% |
| Architecture | Xe² | Ampere |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2560+31900% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+15% | 1777 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 158.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-88% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 66°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+257% | 96.4 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 30.3% less ($91 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 248.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $249-29% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $209-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 60.0+249% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | GA106 |
| Release | September 24 2024 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #434 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
