FirePro S9000
Radeon R9 M395X
FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M395X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M395X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌316.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M395X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,899 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 321.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9000) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,059 | 5,120+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+9% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro S9000 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro S9000) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M395X) — the FirePro S9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 68.3+204% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro S9000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M395X was 76% cheaper ($1899 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (FirePro S9000) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Radeon R9 M395X offers 325% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395X (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $600-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 8.5+325% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Amethyst |
| Release | August 24 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #441 | #438 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M395X
