FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 1050
FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2171.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 45.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌275% higher power demand at 225W vs 60W.
- ❌84.1% longer card at 267mm vs 145mm.
GeForce GTX 1050
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,389 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2160.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.8 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 225W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 267mm, a 122mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.
GeForce GTX 1050
The GeForce GTX 1050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,033 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the GeForce GTX 1050 reaches 5,033 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9000) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 1050). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000) vs 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,059 | 5,033 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+180% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+73% | 1.862 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+87% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro S9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 carries 2 GB. FirePro S9000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro S9000 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050) — the GeForce GTX 1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9000) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1050's 60W — a 115.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 65 C.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 60W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 65 C-28% |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 83.9+273% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro S9000 came in at $2499, while the GeForce GTX 1050 launched at $110. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 was 95.6% cheaper ($2389 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (FirePro S9000) vs 45.8 (GeForce GTX 1050) — the GeForce GTX 1050 offers 2190% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $110-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 45.8+2190% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GP107 |
| Release | August 24 2012 | October 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #441 | #443 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 1050
