FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1837.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
- ❌84.1% longer card at 267mm vs 145mm.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,370 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1859% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅FirePro S9000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 267mm, a 122mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB reaches 5,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9000) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000) vs 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,059 | 5,116+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+133% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+38% | 2.332 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 112+133% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+56% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro S9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB carries 3 GB. FirePro S9000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro S9000 and 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9000) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 65.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 65-28% |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 68.2+203% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro S9000 came in at $2499, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB was 94.8% cheaper ($2370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (FirePro S9000) vs 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 1885% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 3GB (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $129-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 39.7+1885% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GP107 |
| Release | August 24 2012 | May 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #441 | #440 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
