FirePro S9000
VS
Quadro

FirePro S9000 vs Quadro

FirePro S9000

2012Core: 900 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro

1999Core: 135 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro S9000 is positioned at rank 291 and the Quadro is on rank 215, so the Quadro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000

#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
99%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
99%
#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
97%
#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
96%
#276
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7313%
#291
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
100%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
98%
#295
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
98%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
97%
#300
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
96%
#301
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
96%
#302
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
94%
#303
FirePro 3D V3700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
90%
#304
GRID T4-1Q
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600
87%
#305
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
86%
#306
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro

#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
98%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
98%
#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
88%
#200
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2955%
#215
Quadro
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
100%
#216
FirePro W5000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
99%
#219
FirePro W7000 Adapter
MSRP: $899|Avg: $15
98%
#220
Quadro K420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
97%
#223
FirePro W7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $50
96%
#224
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $100
95%
#226
FirePro D500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
91%
#227
FirePro 3D V4800
MSRP: $189|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The FirePro S9000 is significantly newer (2012 vs 1999). The FirePro S9000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro S9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro.

InsightFirePro S9000Quadro
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (1999 / Celsius (1999−2005))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $156), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 208.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro S9000Quadro
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+208.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($156)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9000 and Quadro

AMD

FirePro S9000

The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

NVIDIA

Quadro

The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the Quadro reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 28 nm vs 220 nm.

FeatureFirePro S9000Quadro
G3D Mark Score
5,059+1%
5,000
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Celsius
Process Node
28 nm
220 nm
ROPs
32+700%
4
TMUs
112+2700%
4

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S9000Quadro
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S9000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro has 2 GB. The FirePro S9000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureFirePro S9000Quadro
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.

FeatureFirePro S9000Quadro
Max Displays
6+500%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).

FeatureFirePro S9000Quadro
Encoder
VCE 1.0
None
Decoder
UVD 3.2
MPEG-2 Acceleration
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro S9000Quadro
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
22.5
66.7+196%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $156, while the Quadro launched at $1000 and now averages $50. The Quadro costs 67.9% less ($106 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.4 (FirePro S9000) vs 100.0 (Quadro) — the Quadro offers 208.6% better value. The FirePro S9000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 1999).

FeatureFirePro S9000Quadro
MSRP
$2499
$1000-60%
Avg Price (30d)
$156
$50-68%
Performance per Dollar
32.4
100.0+209%
Codename
Tahiti
NV10
Release
August 24 2012
1999
Ranking
#441
#900