
FirePro S9000

Quadro
FirePro S9000 vs Quadro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S9000 vs Quadro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro S9000 vs Quadro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌149.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,499 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 147% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅FirePro S9000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌1999 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S9000 vs Quadro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the Quadro reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 28 nm vs 220 nm.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,059+1% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Celsius |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 220 nm |
| ROPs | 32+700% | 4 |
| TMUs | 112+2700% | 4 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro carries 2 GB. FirePro S9000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro S9000 and 64-bit on the Quadro.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 6+500% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | MPEG-2 Acceleration |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 66.7+196% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro S9000 came in at $2499, while the Quadro launched at $1000. On MSRP, Quadro was 60% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (FirePro S9000) vs 5.0 (Quadro) — the Quadro offers 150% better value. The newer card here is FirePro S9000 (2012 vs 1999).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $1000-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 5.0+150% |
| Codename | Tahiti | NV10 |
| Release | August 24 2012 | 1999 |
| Ranking | #441 | #900 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















