
FirePro S9000 vs Quadro

FirePro S9000
Popular choices:

Quadro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro S9000 is positioned at rank 291 and the Quadro is on rank 215, so the Quadro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000
Performance Per Dollar Quadro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro S9000 is significantly newer (2012 vs 1999). The FirePro S9000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro.
| Insight | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (1999 / Celsius (1999−2005)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $156), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 208.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+208.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($156) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9000 and Quadro

FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the Quadro reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 28 nm vs 220 nm.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,059+1% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Celsius |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 220 nm |
| ROPs | 32+700% | 4 |
| TMUs | 112+2700% | 4 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro has 2 GB. The FirePro S9000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 6+500% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | MPEG-2 Acceleration |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 66.7+196% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S9000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $156, while the Quadro launched at $1000 and now averages $50. The Quadro costs 67.9% less ($106 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.4 (FirePro S9000) vs 100.0 (Quadro) — the Quadro offers 208.6% better value. The FirePro S9000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 1999).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $1000-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $156 | $50-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.4 | 100.0+209% |
| Codename | Tahiti | NV10 |
| Release | August 24 2012 | 1999 |
| Ranking | #441 | #900 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















