FirePro S9000 vs Quadro T1000 (móvel)

FirePro S9000

2012Core: 900 MHz

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro S9000

225

5,059

+1.2%

Radeon HD 6970

Radeon HD8970M

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

5,000

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro S9000 is positioned at rank 291 and the Quadro T1000 (móvel) is on rank 139, so the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

99%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

99%

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

97%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

96%

#276

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

7313%

#291

FirePro S9000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156

100%

#294

GRID P40-4Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

98%

#295

RTXA5000-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

98%

#296

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

97%

#300

GRID K220Q

MSRP: $469|Avg: $40

96%

#301

FirePro W9100

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200

96%

#302

GRID T4-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000

94%

#303

FirePro 3D V3700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

90%

#304

GRID T4-1Q

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600

87%

#305

GRID M60-2Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

86%

#306

NVS 310

MSRP: $159|Avg: $10

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 (móvel)

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

90%

#123

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1477%

#138

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

100%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

100%

#140

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

99%

#141

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

99%

#142

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

98%

#143

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

96%

#144

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

96%

#145

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

95%

#146

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

94%

#147

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

92%

#148

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

92%

#150

FirePro M40003

MSRP: $150|Avg: $72

91%

#151

Radeon Pro 465

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

91%

#153

Tesla P4

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Quadro T1000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro S9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1000 (móvel).

Insight	FirePro S9000	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $156 for the FirePro S9000, it costs 23% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 28.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro S9000	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+28.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($156)	✅More affordable ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro S9000 Benchmark Check

Quadro T1000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9000 and Quadro T1000 (móvel)

FirePro S9000

The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the Quadro T1000 (móvel) reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9000) vs 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000) vs 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)).

Feature	FirePro S9000	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	5,059+1%	5,000
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1792+133%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS+44%	2.235 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+133%	48
L1 Cache	448 KB	768 KB+71%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro S9000	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9000) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro S9000	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro S9000	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	22.5	100.0+344%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $156, while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $120. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) costs 23.1% less ($36 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.4 (FirePro S9000) vs 41.7 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 28.7% better value. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).