
FirePro S9000
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro S9000 is positioned at rank #291 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon Pro Vega 20 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro S9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 20 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro Vega 20

FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon Pro Vega 20
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 reaches 5,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9000) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,059 | 5,169+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+40% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 3.284 TFLOPS+2% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+40% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 0 MB. The FirePro S9000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9000) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9000) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro S9000) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 100W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 80-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 51.7+130% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S9000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $156, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 costs 100+% less ($156 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.4 (FirePro S9000) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $156 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tahiti | Vega 12 |
| Release | August 24 2012 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #441 | #435 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















