FirePro S9000
VS
GRID M60-2Q

FirePro S9000 vs GRID M60-2Q

FirePro S9000

2012Core: 900 MHz
VS

GRID M60-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro S9000 is positioned at rank 291 and the GRID M60-2Q is on rank 305, so the FirePro S9000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000

#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
99%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
99%
#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
97%
#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
96%
#276
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7313%
#291
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
100%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
98%
#295
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
98%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
97%
#300
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
96%
#301
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
96%
#302
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
94%
#303
FirePro 3D V3700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
90%
#304
GRID T4-1Q
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600
87%
#305
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
86%
#306
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-2Q

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
91%
#289
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
8539%
#304
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
100%
#305
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
100%
#307
FirePro 3D V3750
MSRP: $199|Avg: $25
99%
#308
NVS 810
MSRP: $700|Avg: $80
98%
#309
GRID P40-2Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340
97%
#310
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
95%
#311
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
94%
#312
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
92%
#313
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
91%
#314
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
91%
#316
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
89%
#317
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
88%
#318
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
88%
#319
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M60-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro S9000.

InsightFirePro S9000GRID M60-2Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)
Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID M60-2Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M60-2Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $156), it costs 4% less, resulting in a 7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro S9000GRID M60-2Q
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+7%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($156)
More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
Valorant
No prediction data available
Valorant
No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9000 and GRID M60-2Q

AMD

FirePro S9000

The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9000) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q).

FeatureFirePro S9000GRID M60-2Q
G3D Mark Score
5,059
5,203+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792
2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+50%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
112
128+14%
L1 Cache
448 KB
768 KB+71%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S9000GRID M60-2Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9000) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S9000GRID M60-2Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID M60-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro S9000GRID M60-2Q
TDP
225W
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
22.5
23.1+3%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $156, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The GRID M60-2Q costs 3.8% less ($6 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.4 (FirePro S9000) vs 34.7 (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q offers 7.1% better value. The GRID M60-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro S9000GRID M60-2Q
MSRP
$2499-17%
$3000
Avg Price (30d)
$156
$150-4%
Performance per Dollar
32.4
34.7+7%
Codename
Tahiti
GM204
Release
August 24 2012
August 30 2015
Ranking
#441
#433