FirePro S9000 vs GRID M60-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S9000 vs GRID M60-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro S9000 vs GRID M60-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S9000

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $501 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M60-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M60-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (5,203 vs 5,059), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro S9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro S9000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $501 cheaper on MSRP at $2,499 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16.7% (2.0 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M60-2Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro S9000 vs GRID M60-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S9000

The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9000 scores 5,059 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9000) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q).

Feature	FirePro S9000	GRID M60-2Q
G3D Mark Score	5,059	5,203+3%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1792	2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+50%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	112	128+14%
L1 Cache	448 KB	768 KB+71%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro S9000	GRID M60-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro S9000 and 128-bit on the GRID M60-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9000) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro S9000	GRID M60-2Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9000 draws 225W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID M60-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9000) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro S9000	GRID M60-2Q
TDP	225W	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	22.5	23.1+3%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S9000 came in at $2499, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, FirePro S9000 was 16.7% cheaper ($501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (FirePro S9000) vs 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) — the FirePro S9000 offers 17.6% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-2Q (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro S9000	GRID M60-2Q
MSRP	$2499-17%	$3000
Performance per Dollar	2.0+18%	1.7
Codename	Tahiti	GM204
Release	August 24 2012	August 30 2015
Ranking	#441	#433

Search FirePro S9000 on Amazon

Search GRID M60-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.