GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
VS
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

2017Core: 1493 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

2014Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is positioned at rank 180 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is on rank 408, so the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

#170
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
356%
#172
322%
#173
322%
#177
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
292%
#178
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
290%
#180
100%
#181
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#182
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
#183
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

#398
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1448%
#400
1312%
#401
1309%
#405
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1190%
#406
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1182%
#408
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
100%
#409
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
98%
#410
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
97%
#411
96%
#412
Intel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#413
Radeon R7 A365
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
96%
#414
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
95%
#415
Radeon HD 7620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#416
Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP: $550|Avg: $120
94%
#417
Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSRP: $503|Avg: $400
93%
#418
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $20
92%
#419
92%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
92%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
91%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel).

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%)
Leading raw performance (+3.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $200), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 197.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+197.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($65)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) and Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,800 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) scores 5,800 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire uses GCN, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
G3D Mark Score
5,800
6,000+3%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
2560+233%
Boost Clock
1620 MHz+80%
900 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 307.2 GB/s (Dual) (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — a 174.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit (Dual).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
307.2 GB/s (Dual)+174%
Bus Width
128-bit
512-bit (Dual)+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Encoder
NVENC (6th Gen)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
TDP
75W-63%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
77.3+158%
30.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) costs 67.5% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 89.2 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 30.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) offers 197.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP
$800
Avg Price (30d)
$65-68%
$200
Performance per Dollar
89.2+197%
30.0
Codename
GP107
Neptune CF
Release
January 3 2017
March 1 2014
Ranking
#405
#348