
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs GeForce GTX 970

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 970
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 970 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and GeForce GTX 970

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB scores 9,815 and the GeForce GTX 970 reaches 9,640 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 970 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,815+2% | 9,640 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 1664+44% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.935 TFLOPS | 3.92 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1708 MHz+45% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 56+17% |
| TMUs | 72 | 104+44% |
| L1 Cache | 432 KB | 624 KB+44% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 970 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 970 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 970) — the GeForce GTX 970 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 2nd gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB draws 120W versus the GeForce GTX 970's 150W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 970). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-20% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.8+27% | 64.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 970 launched at $329 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 196.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 192.8 (GeForce GTX 970) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers 1.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-40% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 196.3+2% | 192.8 |
| Codename | GP106 | GM204 |
| Release | August 18 2016 | September 19 2014 |
| Ranking | #272 | #269 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















