GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1708 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $450 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Delivers 228.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Draws 120W instead of 275W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 28.2% longer card at 250mm vs 195mm.

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015

Why buy it

  • 15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • Measures 195mm instead of 250mm, a 55mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 226.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $649 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 129.2% higher power demand at 275W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1060 3GB instead at 9,815 vs 9,741, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $450 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 228.6% (49.3 vs 15.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB scores 9,815 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 3GBRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
G3D Mark Score
9,815
9,741
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1152
4096+256%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.935 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+119%
Boost Clock
1708 MHz+63%
1050 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
72
256+256%
L1 Cache
0.42 MB
1 MB+138%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 3GBRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 3GBRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
512 GB/s+167%
Bus Width
192-bit
4096-bit+2033%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 3GBRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
DirectX
12.1
12.0
Vulkan
1.1
1.2+9%
OpenGL
4.5+2%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 3GBRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
UVD 6.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB draws 120W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 78.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 3GBRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
TDP
120W-56%
275W
Recommended PSU
400W-33%
600W
Power Connector
6-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
250mm
195mm
Height
111mm
115mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
65°C-13%
Perf/Watt
81.8+131%
35.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB came in at $199, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 3GB was 69.3% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 49.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 15.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers 228.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 3GB (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 3GBRadeon R9 Fury + Fury X
MSRP
$199-69%
$649
Performance per Dollar
49.3+229%
15.0
Codename
GP106
Fiji
Release
August 18 2016
June 24 2015
Ranking
#272
#282

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.