
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 228.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 275W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌28.2% longer card at 250mm vs 195mm.
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 250mm, a 55mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌226.1% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌129.2% higher power demand at 275W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB scores 9,815 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,815 | 9,741 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 4096+256% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.935 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+119% |
| Boost Clock | 1708 MHz+63% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 72 | 256+256% |
| L1 Cache | 0.42 MB | 1 MB+138% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 512 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 4096-bit+2033% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5+2% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB draws 120W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 78.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-56% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-33% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 195mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 81.8+131% | 35.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB came in at $199, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 3GB was 69.3% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 49.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 15.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers 228.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 3GB (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-69% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3+229% | 15.0 |
| Codename | GP106 | Fiji |
| Release | August 18 2016 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #272 | #282 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















