Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

Intel

Arc A730M

2022Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1708 MHz
GTX family
·······

Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 1060 3GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 1060 3GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A730M

2022

Why buy it

  • 80.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 3 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A730M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 80.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1060 3GB instead at 9,815 vs 9,808, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A730M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 16nm, 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A730M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A730M

The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A730M scores 9,808 and the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB reaches 9,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1708 MHz.

FeatureArc A730MGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
G3D Mark Score
9,808
9,815
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Pascal
Process Node
6 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
3072+167%
1152
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.6 TFLOPS+220%
3.935 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+20%
1708 MHz
ROPs
96+100%
48
TMUs
192+167%
72
L1 Cache
4.5 MB+971%
0.42 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB+700%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A730M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A730MGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A730M has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB carries 3 GB. Arc A730M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — a 75% advantage for the Arc A730M. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Arc A730M and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A730MGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+300%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s+75%
192 GB/s
Bus Width
192-bit
192-bit
L2 Cache
12 MB+700%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A730MGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB).

FeatureArc A730MGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB's 120W — a 40% difference. The Arc A730M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 250mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureArc A730MGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
TDP
80W-33%
120W
Recommended PSU
500W
400W-20%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
0mm
250mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
122.6+50%
81.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A730M (2022 vs 2016).

FeatureArc A730MGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
MSRP
$199
Codename
DG2-512
GP106
Release
2022
August 18 2016
Ranking
#264
#272

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.