
Arc A730M vs GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Arc A730M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc A730M is positioned at rank #196 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A730M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A730M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A730M and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Arc A730M
The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1035 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,080 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A730M scores 9,808 and the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile reaches 10,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 5.299 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1035 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A730M) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile) with 384 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,808 | 10,080+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.6 TFLOPS+138% | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+98% | 1035 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+140% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+80% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+20% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 384+380% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A730M comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 8 GB. The Arc A730M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile) — a 75% advantage for the Arc A730M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+75% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile).
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile's 75W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 75W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 122.6 | 134.4+10% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















