Arc A730M
VS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Arc A730M vs GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Intel

Arc A730M

2022Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

2021Core: 712 MHzBoost: 1057 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc A730M is positioned at rank #196 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A730M

#186
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
387%
#188
351%
#189
350%
#193
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
319%
#194
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
316%
#196
Arc A730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#197
100%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
96%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
187%
#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
134%
#53
Radeon RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
129%
#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
118%
#60
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
92%
#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
89%
#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A730M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightArc A730MGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)
Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity
Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)
🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A730M and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Intel

Arc A730M

The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 712 MHz to 1057 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,080 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A730M scores 9,808 and the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile reaches 10,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 4.329 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1057 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A730M) vs 16 (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) with 384 Tensor cores vs 64.

FeatureArc A730MGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
9,808
10,080+3%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Ampere
Process Node
6 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
3072+50%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.6 TFLOPS+191%
4.329 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+94%
1057 MHz
ROPs
96+140%
40
TMUs
192+200%
64
L1 Cache
4.5 MB+125%
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB+500%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
24+50%
16
Tensor Cores
384+500%
64

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A730MGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
XeSS
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A730M comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile has 8 GB. The Arc A730M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) — a 75% advantage for the Arc A730M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A730MGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+50%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s+75%
192 GB/s
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
12 MB+500%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A730MGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile).

FeatureArc A730MGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile's 75W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureArc A730MGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
TDP
80W
75W-6%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
122.6
134.4+10%