Arc A730M vs Radeon 8040S

Intel

Arc A730M

2022Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 8040S

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc A730M vs Radeon 8040S Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A730M vs Radeon 8040S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A730M vs Radeon 8040S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A730M

2022

Why buy it

  • 118.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Radeon 8040S is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 45.5% higher power demand at 80W vs 55W.

Radeon 8040S

2025

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 55W instead of 80W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A730M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 118.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (9,808 vs 9,756), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 8040S is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 6nm, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 8040S makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Arc A730M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A730M vs Radeon 8040S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A730M

The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

AMD

Radeon 8040S

The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A730M scores 9,808 and the Radeon 8040S reaches 9,756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon 8040S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 1,024 (Radeon 8040S). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2800 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A730M) vs 16 (Radeon 8040S) with 384 Tensor cores.

FeatureArc A730MRadeon 8040S
G3D Mark Score
9,808
9,756
Architecture
Generation 12.7
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
6 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
3072+200%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.6 TFLOPS+120%
5.734 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
2800 MHz+37%
ROPs
96+200%
32
TMUs
192+200%
64
L2 Cache
12 MB+50%
8 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
24+50%
16

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A730MRadeon 8040S
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A730M has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 8040S carries 4 GB. Arc A730M gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Arc A730M and System on the Radeon 8040S. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A730MRadeon 8040S
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+200%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
System
Bus Width
192-bit
System
L2 Cache
12 MB+50%
8 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8040S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A730MRadeon 8040S
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S).

FeatureArc A730MRadeon 8040S
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCN 4.5
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
VCN 4.5
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the Radeon 8040S's 55W — a 37% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 500W (Radeon 8040S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureArc A730MRadeon 8040S
TDP
80W
55W-31%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
122.6
177.4+45%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 8040S (2025 vs 2022).

FeatureArc A730MRadeon 8040S
MSRP
$400
Codename
DG2-512
Strix Halo
Release
2022
January 6 2025
Ranking
#264
#265

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.