Arc A730M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A730M
2022Why buy it
- ✅54.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A730M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A730M
The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A730M scores 9,808 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) reaches 10,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1485 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,808 | 10,119+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+200% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.6 TFLOPS+314% | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+38% | 1485 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+200% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+350% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+1100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A730M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A730M has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) carries 6 GB. Arc A730M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) — a 16.7% advantage for the Arc A730M. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Arc A730M and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile). L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+17% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+1100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)).
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)'s 50W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 50W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 122.6 | 202.4+65% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A730M and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
