GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

110%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

100%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

100%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

91%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

90%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB	GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (250mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $150), it costs 57% less, resulting in a 136% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB	GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+136%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($65)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,063 points. Launch price was $299.

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1379 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,842 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB scores 10,063 and the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design reaches 9,842 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) vs 2,048 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) vs 5.648 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1709 MHz vs 1379 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB	GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	10,063+2%	9,842
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Process Node	16 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	1280	2048+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.375 TFLOPS	5.648 TFLOPS+29%
Boost Clock	1709 MHz+24%	1379 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	80	128+60%
L1 Cache	480 KB	768 KB+60%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB	GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB	GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	256 GB/s+33%
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB	GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12 (FL 12_1)	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: PureVideo VP7 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB	GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	NVENC 4th gen	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP7	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB draws 120W versus the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design's 115W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB	GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
TDP	120W	115W-4%
Recommended PSU	400W-20%	500W
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	250mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	83.9	85.6+2%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB costs 56.7% less ($85 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 154.8 (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) vs 65.6 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB offers 136% better value. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).