GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W6400

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1708 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

2022Core: 2331 MHzBoost: 2331 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W6400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W6400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)

2016

Why buy it

  • 31.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • 60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 31.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W6400 instead at 8,428 vs 8,160, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 16nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) vs Radeon PRO W6400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,160 points. Launch price was $237.11.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) scores 8,160 and the Radeon PRO W6400 reaches 8,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 4.275 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 2331 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)Radeon PRO W6400
G3D Mark Score
8,160
8,428+3%
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1280+67%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.275 TFLOPS+19%
3.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1708 MHz
2331 MHz+36%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
80+67%
48
L1 Cache
480 KB+88%
256 KB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)Radeon PRO W6400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6400. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)Radeon PRO W6400
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)Radeon PRO W6400
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.2+9%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)Radeon PRO W6400
Encoder
NVENC 6.0
VCN 3.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP8
VCN 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)Radeon PRO W6400
TDP
80W
50W-38%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
102.0
168.6+65%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6400 (2022 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP
$229
Codename
GP106
Navi 24
Release
August 15 2016
January 19 2022
Ranking
#343
#308

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.