GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
VS
Quadro K6000

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) vs Quadro K6000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

2023Core: 1545 MHzBoost: 1890 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

2013Core: 797 MHzBoost: 902 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is positioned at rank 11 and the Quadro K6000 is on rank 319, so the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
113%
#8
103%
#9
102%
#11
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
93%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
92%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K6000

#303
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9719%
#318
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
100%
#319
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
100%
#320
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
99%
#321
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
97%
#322
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
93%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
93%
#324
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
91%
#325
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
91%
#326
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
90%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
90%
#328
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
88%
#329
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
86%
#330
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
85%
#331
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
84%
#333
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Quadro K6000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Longevity
Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (265mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) and Quadro K6000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,160 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) scores 8,160 and the Quadro K6000 reaches 7,993 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K6000 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 2,880 (Quadro K6000). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 902 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Quadro K6000
G3D Mark Score
8,160+2%
7,993
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Kepler
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3072+7%
2880
Compute (TFLOPS)
11.61 TFLOPS+123%
5.196 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1890 MHz+110%
902 MHz
ROPs
48
48
TMUs
96
240+150%
L1 Cache
3 MB+1204%
0.23 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+2033%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Quadro K6000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro K6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) — a 9.9% advantage for the Quadro K6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Quadro K6000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
12 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
211 GB/s+10%
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
32 MB+2033%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 11.0 (Quadro K6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Quadro K6000
DirectX
12+9%
11.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Quadro K6000
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
NVENC 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd Gen
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,H.265
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the Quadro K6000's 225W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 350W (Quadro K6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 265mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Quadro K6000
TDP
115W-49%
225W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
265mm
Height
0mm
110mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
70-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
71.0+100%
35.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Quadro K6000
MSRP
$5265
Avg Price (30d)
$300
Codename
AD107
GK110B
Release
January 3 2023
July 23 2013
Ranking
#102
#318