GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)

2025

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅29.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 29.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) instead at 10,465 vs 10,128, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,465 points.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,128 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) scores 10,465 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) reaches 10,128 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1590 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	10,465+3%	10,128
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	Turing
Process Node	4 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4608+200%	1536
Boost Clock	2520 MHz+58%	1590 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel). Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	256 GB/s	288 GB/s+13%
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
Encoder	NVENC 6th gen	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd gen	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)'s 80W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
TDP	50W-38%	80W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	209.3+65%	126.6