
GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Performance Per Dollar RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile).
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Blackwell (2024−2025) / 4nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,465 points.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) scores 10,465 versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 11,009 — the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU leads by 5.2%. The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1140 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,465 | 11,009+5% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+125% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+121% | 1140 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 35W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 82mm |
| Height | — | 4mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 209.3 | 314.5+50% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















