
GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
2025Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅5.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
2025GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅5.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 88 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,465 points.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) scores 10,465 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) reaches 10,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1485 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,465+3% | 10,119 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+350% | 1024 |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+70% | 1485 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile). Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 288 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)'s 50W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 209.3+3% | 202.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












