
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro W5700 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro W5700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro W5700.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $99 versus $300 for the Radeon Pro W5700, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 209.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+209.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($99) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and Radeon Pro W5700

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 2432 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,673 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti scores 14,673 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,432 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 8.186 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,673+2% | 14,380 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2432+6% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.186 TFLOPS | 8.893 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 1930 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 13% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-12% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.5+16% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 and now averages $300. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti costs 67% less ($201 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 148.2 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 47.9 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti offers 209.4% better value. The Radeon Pro W5700 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-50% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99-67% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 148.2+209% | 47.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | November 2 2017 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #161 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















