
GeForce GTX 1070

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅62.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌154.4% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 1070 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1070 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1070 leads by 71.6%. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507+72% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+114% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS+117% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz+1% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+114% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB | 896 KB+24% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1070 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1070. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 1070 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+100% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0 | 104.9+17% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1070 came in at $379, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 60.7% cheaper ($230 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 48.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | $149-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6 | 52.8+48% |
| Codename | GP104 | TU117 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #185 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















