
GeForce GTX 1070 vs Titan X Pascal

GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Titan X Pascal is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1070.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $200), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 147.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+147.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and Titan X Pascal

GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507 | 13,660+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3584+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 10.97 TFLOPS+70% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz+10% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 120 | 224+87% |
| L1 Cache | 0.7 MB | 1.3 MB+86% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 87.5% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the Titan X Pascal has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 480 GB/s+88% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+65% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199 and now averages $200. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 60% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 168.8 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 68.3 (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 147.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-68% | $1199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-60% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 168.8+147% | 68.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP102 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #185 | #198 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















