GeForce GTX 1070
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,120 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 846% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 400W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅41.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌823.2% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 400W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1967 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507+2% | 13,182 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3840 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+134% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 1967 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 120 | 240 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB | 768 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 237.5% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 1070 and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 864 GB/s+238% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-63% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 280mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+173% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1070 came in at $379, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1070 was 89.2% cheaper ($3120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 836.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-89% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6+837% | 3.8 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #185 | #157 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1070 and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
