
GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,609 vs 22,713).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅+45.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅+45.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,609 vs 22,713).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than GeForce GTX 1080?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1080 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 628 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 312 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 364 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 22,713 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB leads by 45.5%. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609 | 22,713+46% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4352+70% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+149% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2535 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+18% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 4.3 MB+357% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1080 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1080 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 11.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+11% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 8.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2.2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 165W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-9% | 2.2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7 | 137.7+59% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 launched at $599 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB costs 16.7% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 74.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $499-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.1 | 45.5+74% |
| Codename | GP104 | AD106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #137 | #56 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













