
GeForce GTX 1080 vs Quadro P6000

GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+193%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1080 holds the technical lead. Priced at $91 (vs $1,500), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1558.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1558.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($91) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and Quadro P6000

GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 and the Quadro P6000 reaches 15,512 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609 | 15,512 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+42% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+5% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.4 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 193% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 35% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 23.438 GB+193% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 432 GB/s+35% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-28% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7+40% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $91, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999 and now averages $1500. The GeForce GTX 1080 costs 93.9% less ($1409 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 171.5 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 10.3 (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce GTX 1080 offers 1565% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-90% | $5999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $91-94% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 171.5+1565% | 10.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












