
GeForce GTX 1080 vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation

GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The RTX 2000E Ada Generation likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1080 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $91 versus $999 for the RTX 2000E Ada Generation, it costs 91% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1023.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1080 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1023.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($91) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and RTX 2000E Ada Generation

GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2130 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609+2% | 15,252 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2816+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2130 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+82% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.8 MB+198% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has 16 GB. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — a 42.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+43% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7 | 217.9+151% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $91, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999 and now averages $999. The GeForce GTX 1080 costs 90.9% less ($908 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 171.5 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the GeForce GTX 1080 offers 1020.9% better value. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-40% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $91-91% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 171.5+1021% | 15.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | AD107 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #137 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












