GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro M6000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

2017Core: 1290 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M6000

2015Core: 988 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro M6000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro M6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro M6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).

Quadro M6000

2015

Why buy it

  • 2.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (11,769 vs 11,566), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M6000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro M6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,566 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000

The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design scores 11,566 and the Quadro M6000 reaches 11,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 7.516 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro M6000
G3D Mark Score
11,566
11,769+2%
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560
3072+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.516 TFLOPS+10%
6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1468 MHz+32%
1114 MHz
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
160
192+20%
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
1.1 MB+17%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro M6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 carries 12 GB. Quadro M6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) — a 23.8% advantage for the Quadro M6000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design and 384-bit on the Quadro M6000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the Quadro M6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro M6000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
12 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5X
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
317 GB/s+24%
Bus Width
256-bit
384-bit+50%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro M6000
DirectX
12.1
12/1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro M6000
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design draws 150W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro M6000
TDP
150W-40%
250W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
112mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
77.1+64%
47.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro M6000
MSRP
$4999
Codename
GP104
GM200
Release
June 27 2017
March 21 2015
Ranking
#257
#228

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.