
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅56.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
2023GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅56.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,160 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) scores 8,160 and the GeForce GTX 1650 reaches 7,869 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,160+4% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+243% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.61 TFLOPS+289% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1890 MHz+14% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+71% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+241% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile). Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+50% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 75W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.0 | 104.9+48% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU117 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #102 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













